Anonymised cases from the first 18 months of audits in Pakistan. Names, employers, and specific institutions are redacted. Scores and destinations are real.
Applied for UK student visa with funds held 18 days. Audit flagged 28-day rule. Comparison showed Ireland student visa with no equivalent rule, and Canada with a more achievable financial threshold.
Applicant pivoted to Canada, held funds an additional 12 days, audit re-ran at 84/100. Visa granted on first attempt.
Employer-sponsored work visa. Audit flagged that the offer letter listed a different job title than the labour ministry approval. Score 58/100.
Sponsor reissued documents with consistent job title before submission. Re-audit 87/100. Visa issued in 14 days.
Applicant had a US visa refusal 4 years prior and was planning not to disclose it. Audit flagged this as a critical issue, Canadian forms require disclosure of all prior refusals worldwide. Non-disclosure would have triggered a 5-year ban under misrepresentation rules.
Applicant disclosed the prior refusal with explanation letter. Audit re-ran at 76/100. Visa granted.
Retired applicant visiting family in Spain. Initial audit flagged weak ties-to-home documentation, pension was stated but not documented. Score 51/100.
Added pension certificate, property deeds, and family employment letters. Re-audit 79/100. Visa granted.
Applicant was deciding between PhD programs in three countries. Tier 3 audit compared file against all three rule packs. Australia scored 68, Canada 81, UK 73, same file, different documentary fits.
Applicant prioritized Canada based on documentary fit and timeline. Application submitted with full rule alignment. Visa granted.
